The brochures lacks a prospect-number of the Dutch Authority Financial Markets (afm.nl). No search results on AFM.nl website, when entering:fastned The prospectus on their own website is al... Se mer
Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer
För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer
Det här tycker kunderna
Fastned is voor EV rijders een betrouwbare plek om de auto te laden. Fastned behoort in mijn ervaring tot de top-3 in Europa. Echter, het gaat niet altijd goed. Zo heeft Fastned bij de Aire de la Ma... Se mer
Stoppen met laden: bij anderen: - batch er weer voor houden, laden stopt, of - sroppen met laden in het hoofdscherm Bij Fastned: - zoeken in het menu, zo'n 4 of 5 levels diep. Heb hier een g... Se mer
Ik wil positief zijn. Heb goede ervaring met Fastned. Dat het geen 5 sterren zijn is omdat hun CarPlay app. in feite geen routeplanner is, hij brengt je namelijk alleen maar naar een van hun stations... Se mer
Ik wil positief zijn
Ik wil positief zijn. Heb goede ervaring met Fastned. Dat het geen 5 sterren zijn is omdat hun CarPlay app. in feite geen routeplanner is, hij brengt je namelijk alleen maar naar een van hun stations en dat is zeer jammer en niet nodig omdat de app in de iPhone wel een echte goede EV routeplanner is. En daar is grote behoefte aan temeer omdat aan de huidige EV CarPlay routeplanners allemaal forse nadelen kleven en daarmee bedoel ik inhoudelijk en niet de kosten.
Fastned not approved by AFM
The brochures lacks a prospect-number of the Dutch Authority Financial Markets (afm.nl).
No search results on AFM.nl website, when entering:fastned
The prospectus on their own website is also lacking a prospectus-number, although they state that their prospectus is approved by the AFM. Everybody can state this on an A4 piece of paper.
As a show of trust, they have an url of the contactpage of the AFM.
Looks like fraud to me or at least stating incorrect properties of the product.
Senior frontend developer
I don't normally write bad reviews for an interview experience but this one had to go public.
Please dont waste your time with the recruitment process of this company. The evaluation is baseless and pointless.
After an initial call with the recruiter, I was given an assignment to work on. It was a chargers dashboard to implement as per the figma provided. The Backend API was provided by the team with the gitlab repo.
First: The API provided by them lacked CORS authorization, and hence while developing had to email the recruiter to ask the BE team to make changes. They did and I continued.
Second: Even other APIs were not CORS authorized so I again had to reach out to the recruiter for the same.
Third: The API itself was not well designed as per HTTP standards.
Once I submitted the assignment, it took them 3 weeks to reach back to me with the results because the “developer” who was supposed to evaluate my assignment was on vacation.
The assignment was in itself a tedious task because they expect you to use what they are already using like tanstack table, tanstack query, react-hook-form etc. Along with that they want it to be 99.99999% to be as per the figma design that they provide.
I got a feeling that it was a task that they were assigned by product and wanted a candidate to complete the task for them. The closest matching code they will fork, make minute changes and merge in the main branch.
After 3 weeks , they came back with the result and rejected me by giving the following lame reasons:
1. Font family used was different than given in figma
2. No toast message when adding or removing a charger(although i had mentioned in comments and readme that this can be a future improvement)
3. No title tag in the html within layout.tsx
Although they gave good feedback about the overall project and the functionality. They agreed that everything works as it was supposed to be in the requirement document.
The reason for rejection is the lamest I have ever heard from any tech company. If some company is rejecting me for using the wrong font-family, MAN! I would like to stay away from that organization.
I think first the devs at fastned need to work on themselves to provide a robust BE to start the assignment and not commit changes to the assignment while the candidate is working on them. They were highly unprofessional.
Trust me guys, no matter how much in need of a job you are, try your luck some other place. They are just getting their product stories completed from candidates while themselves enjoying vacations.
The overall process from HR call to assignment evaluation result took unnecessarily 1 month. POINTLESS!
Interview experience- Senior Frontend dev
I don't normally write bad reviews for an interview experience but this one had to go public.
Please dont waste your time with the recruitment process of this company. The evaluation is baseless and pointless.
After an initial call with the recruiter, I was given an assignment to work on. It was a chargers dashboard to implement as per the figma provided. The Backend API was provided by the team with the gitlab repo.
First: The API provided by them lacked CORS authorization, and hence while developing had to email the recruiter to ask the BE team to make changes. They did and I continued.
Second: Even other APIs were not CORS authorized so I again had to reach out to the recruiter for the same.
Third: The API itself was not well designed as per HTTP standards.
Once I submitted the assignment, it took them 3 weeks to reach back to me with the results because the “developer” who was supposed to evaluate my assignment was on vacation.
The assignment was in itself a tedious task because they expect you to use what they are already using like tanstack table, tanstack query, react-hook-form etc. Along with that they want it to be 99.99999% to be as per the figma design that they provide.
I got a feeling that it was a task that they were assigned by product and wanted a candidate to complete the task for them. The closest matching code they will fork, make minute changes and merge in the main branch.
After 3 weeks , they came back with the result and rejected me by giving the following lame reasons:
1. Font family used was different than given in figma
2. No toast message when adding or removing a charger(although i had mentioned in comments and readme that this can be a future improvement)
3. No title tag in the html within layout.tsx
Although they gave good feedback about the overall project and the functionality. They agreed that everything works as it was supposed to be in the requirement document.
The reason for rejection is the lamest I have ever heard from any tech company. If some company is rejecting me for using the wrong font-family, MAN! I would like to stay away from that organization.
I think first the devs at fastned need to work on themselves to provide a robust BE to start the assignment and not commit changes to the assignment while the candidate is working on them. They were highly unprofessional.
Trust me guys, no matter how much in need of a job you are, try your luck some other place. They are just getting their product stories completed from candidates while themselves enjoying vacations.
The overall process from HR call to assignment evaluation result took unnecessarily 1 month. POINTLESS!
Ontafsoenlijk bedrijf.
Waardeloze helpdesk
Nieuwe auto in account aanmelden lukt pas na een week. De oude auto verwijderen met het bijbehorende abonnement (Gold membership) zorgt voor een vastgelopen app.
Op mail van een week geleden nog geen reactie. Helpdesk weet niks en kan niks. We zullen het escaleren naar het hoofdkantoor...
Daarna stilte
Heb een andere perceptie van een heldesk!
Zou toch zeggen dat ik niet de eerste ben met een nieuwe auto....
Gold Standard EV Rapid Charging…
Gold Standard EV Rapid Charging Stations with Canopy and Lighting.
Niet betrouwbaar.
Niet betrouwbaar.
Obligaties met 6% rente
Heb genoeg van deze bedrijven en ongewenste reclame.
Ze verschuilen zich door een ander de schuld te geven van deze reclame.
PAS OP EN NIET DOEN
Waarschijnlijk grote oplichting.
Detta är Trustpilot
Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.
Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.
Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.
Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.
Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.
Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.
Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.
Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.








