Audiotype Omdömen 

great service, fast, reliable and decent prices. I only use this company as so far they’ve been the most accurate transcribers

I tested quite a few transkription options. I would say 70% are of no use at all Audiotype is one of those with high quality. For me personally the costs are pretty high but i needed the material for my bachelor thesis besides that i am quite happy with the translation.

A really great service used by excellent people and organizations; a serious tool. - Give it a try

My first time using it, seems a good transcription. I like very much to pay just for what I need.

Ahorra mucho tiempo al no tener que oir el audio completo para transcribirlo. Muy útil.

Very easy.
It was very useful.

It was fast, accurate and easy! I love this♥️ I searched a lot for a good site for my movie transcript and I was about to give up until I found this page ^^

Very good, ITS REALLY EASY TO PUT SUBTITLES

Good quality transcripts and good communication! Five stars!

Sucks you in with a 'free trial' for 10x files, doesn't mention you need to pay for more than 60s of the file.
I'll absolutely avoid anywhere that uses marketing tricks like this

perfect service! very impressed by the quality of the transcription in Italian

Essai vraiment concluant, même s'il est nécessaire de “reprendre” certaines choses. La preuve, s'il en est besoin, que l'humain reste premier devant le battage de l'IA... Merci pour cet outil.

Very fast. accurate.

Easy and effective! Really helpful. I'm so happy with it :)

cordial, y graciosa

Simple and quick to use, and I can pay for files as I need them rather than be bound to a subscription.

I'm a computer scientist, not a journalist or an editor .. and we had the 'great' idea of making 3 half hour English workshop videos for an important event.. with about two weeks' notice. Little did I know. So the inicial idea was to interview 2 people per workshop with 3 questions each, edit and interlace the edited sections with some video software.

All interviewers told me they preferred Spanish, so I ended up with 5 zoom videos and audios ranging from 50 to 120 minutes each, from where I had to edit 18 video-sections of about 5 minutes each, all with subtitles in ENGLISH. .. Instead of watching the large Zoom videos, and jotting down the timings for each interesting part, I took the large zoom videos and uploaded them to Audiotype ..

I got the 'textual not perfect but understandable' transcripts some minutes later, in various formats. I used the text paragraph output to feed ChatGPT4 for classifying and summarizing the subjects across the interviews, with initial timings.. From the context, ChatGPT mostly could get the mistranslated parts.

On the other side I took the SRT subtitle file and generated a CSV with the start - end time on 2 columns, and the text in a third, and with a python script I crossed that to get the sections of each line..
I added a column with the total time including decimals of seconds, of each subtitle entry. So when I added another column indicating I would select that text for the subsection, I could add them and see the total timing each section was taking ..

In this way I traversed the interviews to select my 18 sections and their timing..

I passed that excel to the journalist-editors, who gave me then, 18 edited video-sections in Spanish, they were not experts at subtitle managing so I couldn't reuse the original subtitles...

Then I uploaded these 5 minute video-sections to Audiotype again and got the final transcript with the timings of the interventions, I passed this to excel and rough translated the text with ChatGPT, and took that SRT to check the correct translation on the edited video .. It takes time, but infinitely less than it would have been without Audiotype .. Actually, I checked the software before accepting to do the interviews and the translation, since I knew I would heavily depended on this part ... Worth every dollar (I should make a tutorial and publish the scripts ;)