The proof is in how they dealt with Covid and the Hunter Biden laptop "conspiracy theory" that the left-wing media mislead people with and how they heavily censored the content, among other things.... Se mer
Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer
För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer
Det här tycker kunderna
This company can be proud in its part, in absolute zero honesty to anything shown in media and the news. It's a far left 'fact checker', one of the grim annoyances to appear in the Covid era as news o... Se mer
Brilliant fact checking website. They provide links to their sources and reference relevant businesses or institutions so that you may follow up on their research yourself.
I've only looked at one snopes "fact" which was very misleading claiming that the queen was a mechanic. It is one of the most often repeated lies about the monarch. The reality is that she "played a... Se mer
Företagsinformation
Informationen kommer från olika externa källor
Snopes /snoʊps/, formerly known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, claims to be one of the first online fact-checking websites.
Kontaktuppgifter
N Proctor St 2522, 98406, Tacoma, USA
- www.snopes.com
Paying for fact checking? No thanks
Used to be my go to for fact checking but you have to pay to read anything.
Started out promising but has turned…
Started out promising but has turned into a propaganda site that tries to cover up real events.
The fact checking system is not a true fact checking system
The fact checking system is, by logical and judicial standards, ineffective in checking the facts that is issuing judgement in regards to; hence, acting as a passive apparatus of disseminating public information that is seen as a threat to the current status quo. Their Terms and Conditions, and as well the manner of processing the fact checking cases, indicates deep bias in regards to the true validity information that is processed, implying a lack of efficiency in attaining its declared purpose. This system has issued conclusions based on the declarations of incriminated parties, without actually judging the matter separately or seeking alternative possibilities of validating different potential conclusions.
Too politically biased and unreliable
The proof is in how they dealt with Covid and the Hunter Biden laptop "conspiracy theory" that the left-wing media mislead people with and how they heavily censored the content, among other things.
I'm 100% convinced without a shadow of a doubt that they are having their strings pulled by the powers that be with their "fact checkers" label that they falsely claim. That term is so overused anyway it longer means anything thanks to corrupt organizations like this.
Exactly what I asked for!
Exactly what I asked for!! Never has misled me in anyway!!
Extremely biased and no effort put in “Fact-Checking”
Facts are checked using media headlines and they all project a certain narrative.
To get a clear picture of how corrupt and biased the so-called staff, search for "The Death of Fact Checkers" by Upper Echelon on YouTube.
it's too biased for fact-checking supernatural, in particular
some of it's biases are: it insists everything paranormal and supernatural aren't real(when they're explained as something other than mundane hoaxes) regardless of their authenticity
and they're make Big Tech's fact-checkers can't have Alien invasion as next 9/11 for "taking away realism" among others
During the scamdemic my friend posted…
During the scamdemic my friend posted videos everything was factual. They said it was all nonsense. Terrible organisation. My friend even reached out to show them and was in contact with other journalists who behaved similarly. No integrity whatso ever snopes
Fact-Checking sucks
Fact-Checking sucks! Let propaganda & misinformation run amuck, you can't stop it.
Unintelligence...Unintelligent people everywhere!!!
the people who work at snopes are about as idiotic as the people whom they work for. Do some digging instead of believing what these guys say.
The queen was never a mechanic
I've only looked at one snopes "fact" which was very misleading claiming that the queen was a mechanic. It is one of the most often repeated lies about the monarch. The reality is that she "played at being a mechanic and van driver" for the purposes of a newsreel film to serve as propaganda for the war effort.
If you want to find the Communist lie truth to a question, Snopes is for you
This company can be proud in its part, in absolute zero honesty to anything shown in media and the news. It's a far left 'fact checker', one of the grim annoyances to appear in the Covid era as news outlets dishonesty reached new highs. Their method of honesty and fact finding is that of Communism; non existent.
leftist biased "facts"
They often rephrase
They often rephrase, or change the details of a claim made by another, just so they can announce their false version 'FAKE'. They are heavily biased politically and ideologically and so not what they pretend to be. SNOPES = FAKE
Snopes are misinformation…
Snopes are misinformation superspreaders who target people to protect the interests of those who sponsor them. Go elsewhere for your fact checking.
This site is a excellent fact checking…
This site is a excellent fact checking site. Originally it focused upon urban legends but later became indispensable in checking political disinformation.
Brilliant fact checking website
Brilliant fact checking website. They provide links to their sources and reference relevant businesses or institutions so that you may follow up on their research yourself.
Censorship of the Truth is what this web is about
you can be sure that whatever they call 'false' information is something you should research harder!!
Detta är Trustpilot
Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.
Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.
Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.
Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.
Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.
Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.
Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.
Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.








