Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer

För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer

3,2

Medel

TrustScore 3 av 5

1 omdöme

5 stjärnor
4 stjärnor
3 stjärnor
2 stjärnor
1 stjärna

Så använder företaget Trustpilot

Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.

Företag på Trustpilot får inte erbjuda incitament eller betala för att dölja omdömen. Omdömen är enskilda användares åsikter och inte Trustpilots åsikter. Läs mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Be WAREY of International Academy of Family Lawyers -iafl . com lawyers!

www .iafl. com is the website for the International Academy of Family Lawyers. It is where I found a scoundrel named Jean-Michel Camus, working in a company called "Legalcy" at www .legalcy - avocats.fr.
It's a French law firm specializing in family law and international family law (Mr. Camus' review and that of Legalcy is coming next).

The iafl does not have any place on their site to file a grievance or to contact anyone representing them. No phone, no email, no chat, no zoom, no skype, nothing. They have no way to leave feedback on their lawyers. They are the only game in town, as far as I was able to find in google, who has a list of international family lawyers.

I can tell you they have at least one completely unethical, lawyer in the person of Jean-Michel Camus, who I mentioned above, who, once I had decided to hire him and he had my retainer, proceeded to bill me for for every minute on the phone and every email we had prior to his being hired. WITHOUT breathing a word to me that I was paying for all of that! He billed me for finding out about his billing and whether we could work together, AND even billed me for ACCEPTING MY PAYMENT without telling me I was being billed! Of course I could neither accept nor decline, because HE NEVER INFORMED ME! Beyond ludicrous. We had no working contract, I had submitted no payment. It was very clear that I had not yet decided to employ him. If I HAD been told UPFRONT that he was going to be billing me for all of our subsequent conversion and emails, I would have hung up the phone immediately, as would any intelligent person. If I had been told I was going to be billed RETROACTIVELY for all of the aforementioned items above, prior to signing the contract and/or prior to paying the retainer, I would also have refused. It would seem I was expected to read his mind.

On the contract I signed with him, I specifically stated as a condition to my hiring Mr. Camus, that I be informed PRIOR to the using up of any retainer, AND debt obligation to a subsequent one... Mr. Camus entirely ignored this. In fact, the amount of his retainer would have already been completely used up prior to my paying it, because of his "creative" (ie, deceptive) billing scheme. Mr. Camus was employed by me for less than 5 full days during which time he made a total of ONE 10-minute phone call (to the other party's lawyer) and sent FOUR emails.

MR. CAMUS PROPOSES TO CHARGE ME MORE THAN 3,000 (THREE THOUSAND) EUROS FOR HIS "WORK."

I've dealt with lawyers before and have never seen such flagrantly unethical behavior. I am shocked that the iafl would endorse such a lawyer. Maybe they were unaware of it, maybe he hasn't done this before, but he has NOW, and this is the kind of lawyer they are promoting.

Individuals who behave in such a way give lawyers the reputation they have for being snakes and some of the most deceitful and unsavory members of society. Stay FAR away from this site and especially this lawyer, or if you choose to use it (or him, heaven help you!), BEWARE AND TAKE EVERY PRECAUTION. Even though I did, I now have the added hassle of getting the unused portion of my retainer back in addition to the stress of the legal matter that I was already dealing with.

24 november 2020
Omdöme utan inbjudan

Är det här ditt företag?

Registrera din profil för att få tillgång till våra kostnadsfria företagsverktyg, och kom närmare dina kunder.

Skapa ett konto gratis

Detta är Trustpilot

Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.

Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.

Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.

Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.

Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.

Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.

Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.

Läs mer