FutureLearn Omdömen 1 530

I recently completed a course on FutureLearn and was very impressed with the course structure. The mix of articles, videos, and quizzes kept me engaged, and the peer-review system provided valuable insights from other learners. The interface is intuitive and makes it easy to track progress. Highly recommend for professional development!

Excellent experience

The way the course was thought was really good for beginners to understand end to end about the AI.

Signed up for course and never told me I had to pay for my certificate before hand!! Worked for 6 weeks completing modules and did not receive achievement!

[WARNING] Read This Before Purchasing a FutureLearn ExpertTrack: Systemic Flaws and Certification Traps

I want to issue a strong warning to anyone considering purchasing a FutureLearn ExpertTrack subscription. Based on my recent experience completing an ExpertTrack, there are significant structural issues with their assessment criteria that can trap paying users in an indefinite loop, preventing them from receiving their earned certificates.

If you are planning to invest your time and money into this platform, please be aware of the following systemic issues:

1. The "Peer Review" Trap and Indefinite Delays After successfully completing 100% of the courses steps and passing all required objective assessments, my certificate was completely blocked. The system requires peer reviews for the final assignment before a certificate can be generated.

The critical flaw here is that if you are enrolled in a cohort that is inactive, which is highly probable for specialized or niche academic topics, your progress is halted indefinitely. Because you are on a paid, active monthly subscription, you are effectively forced to keep paying while waiting for non-existent peers to grade your work even on Zendesk they say "If you have completed all the courses in your ExpertTrack then we recommend cancelling your subscription to the ExpertTrack via your account area while you wait for your peers to complete their reviews". FutureLearn offers no automatic timeframe for a manual override of team support.

2. Systemic Inconsistency in Assessment Criteria There is a glaring contradiction in FutureLearn's evaluation guidelines that undermines the transparency of their certification process:

The Interface
The "Assessment scores" section of the platform clearly indicates a 50/50 weighting model (the assignment accounts for 50%, and the objective test accounts for 50%).

The Reality
The underlying ExpertTrack documentation contradicts this, stating that a minimum score of 70% on the peer-reviewed assignment is strictly required to receive the certificate.

Why This Matters
Under this conflicting model, your ability to get certified is entirely dependent on the unpredictable availability and diligence of other learners, rather than your own demonstrated knowledge and individual academic performance. An objective, rigorous evaluation process should weigh the objective examination far more heavily (e.g., 70%) to prevent students from being penalized by the inactivity of their peers.

Furthermore, this reliance on peer assessment exposes students to the risk of bad-faith evaluations. A secondary, yet highly detrimental, problem occurs when learners receive arbitrarily low grades from peers who evaluate assignments maliciously or without proper academic diligence. It is worth noting that these exact vulnerabilities in peer-grading systems have already been widely documented on other major platforms, such as Coursera and edX. Subjecting a paid certification to such subjective and potentially punitive peer behavior fundamentally undermines the academic integrity of the platform.

The edX Alternative: A Better Model
In contrast, platforms like edX have improved upon this flawed structure by ensuring that objective exam grades are the sole decisive factor for certification. While peer reviews are still utilized, they only impact the final numeric course grade displayed on the certificate verification page link. This ensures that peer inactivity never blocks or delays the actual issuance of the certificate, protecting the student's investment and time.

The Official Stance
FutureLearn’s official documentation on this issue essentially shifts the burden onto the student without offering a definitive resolution. You can read their unhelpful policy here on their FAQ Zendesk with the title of "My assignment hasn't been reviewed yet. What do I do?" and that says "Due to the nature of peer reviews, we can't guarantee a time-frame for when these reviews will be completed."

Conclusion
Until FutureLearn revises these conflicting assessment weightings, implements a guaranteed manual validation process for inactive cohorts, and takes the necessary structural step of decoupling the peer-reviewed assignments from the issuance of the certificate, I strongly advise caution. You risk paying for a subscription where the final deliverable is indefinitely withheld by systemic flaws and factors entirely outside of your control.

Learning Norwegian-Norsk was a life goal for me. I used to speak using translator apps when I had visited the country before completing this program and people were very happy to hear me speaking their native language, but I suggest you use this program to learn the language the right way, because the material is well organized, the procedure is really encouraging and interactive and I feel more confident now about my accent.

It was really good learning from them

Ik heb hier 2 gratis cursussen gevolgd.
1 over het schrijven van essays op de universitaire manier en 1 over veerkrachtigheid.
Op aanraden van mijn baas vond ik deze site.
Ik vond de cursussen leuk, leerzaam en waardevol.
De meeste cursussen zijn gratis.
Dus dat is fijn.
Het word goed en duidelijk uitgelegd.

FutureLearn used to be great. You could take your time with classes and get instructor feedback. Now, it's all about money and no one responds. Some of the classes are good.

Terrible organisation. I passed an interview, got the job and was made to go to training. After attending the training I had to reach out to Helen on several occasions, to find out whar the next steps were. I called and sent numerous email. Helen never responded. Very unprofessional honestly.

Good intership

Free courses.

Designed with beautiful colouristic elements and pleasant-to-listen-to stories. Made for people with lived experience who share it with passion.

Great opportunity, easy to access materials

I really enjoyed the learning and felt that I had benefited from the training and was delighted to have improved my knowledge and skillset.

Learning is interactive though self paced. Information are very factual and flow is well organised.

Honest helpful and constructive