They don't "have your back", they don't walk the talk
I align with what the person from South Africa wrote.
The contract for COA has anomalies, they did not clarify when asked before signing.
COA program has anomalies not as described, not fit for purpose: One thing said in video and the reality is different, you have to pay extra to have the support they marketed.
A "5 day cooling off" period does not respect UK consumer rights act 2015 and it's overridden by this act.
It seems that they do not respect their own contract points 17.2 and 5.7.
They have a PO box address in their contract, and it seems they did not bother to get a registered letter asking as stated in their contract how to file a complaint (17.2). Never received a reception notice from them for this registered letter, it was sent in April.
In spite of asking within the lawful 14 days for a refund because of contract anomalies, and their program COA is from what I experienced not as described, nor fit(entirely) for purpose. He also gives the same information in the COA away for free in lives. In addition to asking for a refund on the 14th day after purchase, an unforeseen personal disaster (death of my boyfriend) during the weekend following my refund request. This was not even considered and I was gas-lit and basically told to "get on with it", continue the program, stop being" negative" and from that point, all my requests to negotiate were ignored by Ed's team member Carla, the one who answers Ed's emails which seems irresponsable of Ed who proselytizes personal responsibility in lives and every where. Responsibility is after all, the capacity to respond. In spite of slick marketing, in this case, Ed appears to be lacking in responsibility and in walking the talk of "having our backs". The consideration that there could be something wrong with the program or simply allowing that it didn't suit my needs after seeing how it was, and in addition to an unforeseen, life changing event that changed who I was and how I saw my life and future in an instant-a literal bomb going off, was ignored. Yet, they're in the business of self improvement and helping people reach their goals. These goals could radically change overnight and could be a confirmation that coaching was not part of my destiny. So this contradiction, it's "Ed's way-who can do no wrong, the contracts and programs are perfect because he invested millions into them bordering on culty attitude, or the highway", the "support" you paid for retracted because you called problems out and we'll keep your money anyway, is simply unethical, unlawful, and not in alignment with what he says and "markets" to hook people who truly need support and are conned by repetitive stories, examples and hook phrases like "I got your back now", to vulnerable and kind people who want to help and be helped, who are in states of despair that they may or may not recognize so they are vulnerable to manipulation. Sadly, Ed and Team even refused mediation from a neutral mediation organisation that helps avoid legal intervention.This really looks bad for them but shows that I wanted to find a positive solution for everyone so all perspectives are heard and considered.
Yet it's Ed's spokesperson who said I was negative and no one has ever acted like this before which with, in addition, to the gas-lighting about my boyfriend's death, seems, appears to be a form of bullying and psychological abuse which is hugely disappointing from people saying "we've got your back". It's conditional caring, if and only if you adhere to narrow and contradictory vision of what success is. I've been turned off to coaching or wanting to be a coach because of this which was maybe the lesson but at a loss not just of money, but I've loss respect for Ed and those like him that he admires. I do not hold the values of a program that markets to people's pain and overcharges because the person in despair thinks the answers lie outside themselves. Clearly this can work for people who are in the 3D false- matrix, dying- paradigm mindset, where making money is who you are, ego rules, defines your self worth and the illusion that you're in control, not God. I think even from this 3D perspective, Ed and team should respect their own contract, British/International consumer acts, and walk their own talk, when someone asks for a refund within the lawful time frame, give it back, no questions asked. Likewise, for the person from South Africa, if she did the work, and did not get clients, that's your guarantee, give her a full refund. Yes, this is my genuine experience, my perspective and I have emails to back what I've said and done to try to find an amical solution. It shouldn't matter that there are now 2 people disappointed and dissatisfied with Ed and company, especially when you see all the other reviews come from Edjcsmith generated sites.
5 april 2024
Omdöme utan inbjudan