Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer

För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer

Det här tycker kunderna

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

UMA Is the platform used on Polymarket for solving all disputes. Proof in internal chats demonstrate that the votes are associated to tokens. Math is very simple here, the more tokens, the more infl... Se mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

uma.xyz prides itself on being a "truth machine" by giving incentive to vote correctly on subjective markets and make money. However, this couldn't be further from the truth. There is no such thing as... Se mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

UMA is a CENTRALIZED platform OWNED BY polymarket, and that will do whatever their owners tell them to. Look onto the 'USA UKRAINE MINERALS DEAL POLYMARKET SCANDAL' which resulted in the scam and thef... Se mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Some day a whistleblower will spill all to a journalist and we'll hear all the dirt, but for now it's obvious that UMA and Polymarket can't be trusted to tell you the weather yet alone to trust with y... Se mer

1,2

Mycket dålig

TrustScore 1 av 5

65 omdömen

5 stjärnor
4 stjärnor
3 stjärnor
2 stjärnor
1 stjärna

Så använder företaget Trustpilot

Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.

Företag på Trustpilot får inte erbjuda incitament eller betala för att dölja omdömen. Omdömen är enskilda användares åsikter och inte Trustpilots åsikter. Läs mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Scam ❌

Scam ❌, don’t trust them!! I was completely ripped off!!!
After reaching out for help, 🄶🆁𝓔🆈𝓞𝓧🄷🆄🄱🆂 stepped in and got back £22,960 for me.
Highly recommended.

10 januari 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

SCAM

The UMA resolution can be easily influenced by people with a lot of tokens, so the outcomes do not rely on truth, but rather which side has more money put in.

14 mars 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Dodgy

Some day a whistleblower will spill all to a journalist and we'll hear all the dirt, but for now it's obvious that UMA and Polymarket can't be trusted to tell you the weather yet alone to trust with your money.

14 januari 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

They are running a massive scam scheme

They have manipulated markets that were more than obvious. There are whales with 6M UMA that decide 35% of a vote. This means even a couple whales can join and decide a market regardless if their decision is correct or not. Further more these whales bribe polymarket employes to change rules in the middle of a market. UMA also deletes messages and bans people who disagree with the whales. I got banned for 7 days for not agreeing white their decision

3 januari 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Whales manuplated the outcome

will-edgex-launch-a-token-in-2025?

Was a big scam, the obvious result was NO but UMA and Polymarket whales changed the results to YES

Very big scam and I know a lawsuit will follow as its obvious manuplation and insider manipulation.very obvious and SEC and other countries should follow suit to ban this scam company.

I am reporting to SEC and EU authorities too

2 januari 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

UMA is a scam OWNED by polymarket

UMA is a CENTRALIZED platform OWNED BY polymarket, and that will do whatever their owners tell them to. Look onto the 'USA UKRAINE MINERALS DEAL POLYMARKET SCANDAL' which resulted in the scam and theft of over 7 million dollars

27 augusti 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

If I could give a negative review I…

If I could give a negative review I would. UMA is supposed to be a independent decentralized project made for resolving bets (particularly on poly market). In theory (emphasis on „theory“) they would resolve based off of facts. This is not what they do. They make decisions off of the voting stake (backed by buyable tokens). Basically no matter what it is you could just buy „votes“. Currently in the „Thailand bombs Cambodia by Friday“ bet the „NO“ betters (ones who voted it wouldn’t happen) currently have amble evidence showing there was no bombing yet the „YES“ betters (ones who voted that there would be bombing) are winning (have won) for the reasoning that „whales“ with hundreds of thousands of dollars bought out the market. Push for the death of UMA. I hope they get sued and those on the side of truth get the shares they deserve.

30 juli 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Not decentralised nor honest

It claims to be a decentralised oracle, but 2 people hold near 40% of the UMA tokens with different wallets. It's very easy for them to bet on anything and then push for that outcome even against clear visual evidence and facts.

Don't be surprised if at some point UMA token holders will tell you the Earth is a cube.

8 juli 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

THIS WHOLE UMA SYSTEM'S CORRUPT

THIS WHOLE UMA SYSTEM IS BUILT ON A 100% CHANCE OF GETTING SCAMMED. IMAGINE LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THE MOST UMA SHARES CONTROL HOW A VOTE GOES WITH 0 REGARD TO REAL WORLD FACTS. BE AWARE OF IT & STAY AWAY FROM ANYTHING THIS SYSTEM IS INVOLVED IN!

15 juni 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Not impartial, money oriented.

UMA Is the platform used on Polymarket for solving all disputes.
Proof in internal chats demonstrate that the votes are associated to tokens.
Math is very simple here, the more tokens, the more influential the vote will be. The majority receive a share, making the vote completely manipulated by money volume instead of sources or facts. Doesn't sound very decentralised,right?

1 juli 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

These are the real scammers

These are the real scammers! The decision in favor of YES or NO is not determined by an honest vote, but by a few large holders of UMA protocol. Deliberate market manipulation. Do not contact them under any circumstances or you will lose all your money.

2 juli 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Scam website

Scam website. Letting people who made the bet decide what the result is.. giving the high paying people to choose what the result is.

1 juli 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan

Är det här ditt företag?

Registrera din profil för att få tillgång till våra kostnadsfria företagsverktyg, och kom närmare dina kunder.

Skapa ett konto gratis

Detta är Trustpilot

Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.

Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.

Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.

Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.

Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.

Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.

Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.

Läs mer