Abigail failed to respond to every aspect of my complaint and closed it without fully investigating it. There were 4 parts to my complaint and she only responded to 2 and even those comments don't mak... Se mer
Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer
För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer
Det här tycker kunderna
Not quite sure what their role is or how they regulate their members. Seems an utter waste of time, effort and resource. Besides offering only £500 pounds max and no action against their member smacks... Se mer
A weak, gutless and woke organisation, paralysed by trying to appease each and every person who feels they are a victim. A sad reflection of how the UK has declined where a organisation with low pa... Se mer
Totally unreliable at all. The letting agency breached most of the UK laws and managing un licensed property. Property redress still not standing on the facts with justice but defending the letting ag... Se mer
Företagsinformation
- Juridiska tjänster
- också i
- Advokat
Informationen kommer från olika externa källor
Property Redress Scheme is a new government-authorised consumer redress scheme for the Property Industry.
Kontaktuppgifter
Station Road, EN5 1NZ, New Barnet, USA
- theprs.co.uk
Ingen inbjudningshistorik registrerad
Det här företaget har inte bjudit in sina kunder. Omdömen kanske inte är representativa
Så använder företaget Trustpilot
Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.
The PRS handled a complaint for me…
The PRS handled a complaint for me regarding a rogue letting agent who issued possession notice to a tenant on the wrong forms, failed to collect arrears and 'terrorised' my tenants. They also provided 'dodgy' gas certificates and generally performed badly.
Whilst the process was lengthy, the PRS were very thorough in their investigation and my complaint was upheld and compensation awarded.
I would recommend pursuing a complaint through them.
I am in the industry myself, however the properties involved are owned personally and were being managed for me around 300 miles from my location.
They are actually worse than the agent…
They are actually worse than the agent you are making a complaint. I wasted time writing up all the issues in their amateur built website that is also useless. They never read your claim, but they try to close the case after quickly chatting over the phone. I insisted I was not happy to agree on the early resolution, but they put a pressure on me to accept it and gave me false promises. I reused and said it was not fair, but they only told me I can only take it leave it and not allowed to complain. I am shocked they are allowed to operate, and even get paid for it.
I could write a book as large as War…
I could write a book as large as War And Peace on how awful they were, and to be clear, not just on the issues of the complaint itself, but also on the whole process and handling of it. Unbelievably bad.
One even suspects that it is intended to be so. After all, they have paying members to look after.
Don't waste your time with them, go legal.
Completely useless
Completely useless. Immediately closed my complaint because "we do not get involved when the letting agency is doing something illegal". Why else would anyone ever need your help, I don't get it.
The Property Redress Scheme - Shock and Horror
I share this story out of deep shock and horror and without prejudice to assist others as well as myself, this is the truth. As a leaseholder in a block of flats in England, I’ve paid my service charge, ground rent, and buildings insurance (why do I pay that, it’s not my building) on the dot every time for 16 years. The Property Redress Scheme is one of three government authorised schemes that gives consumers of the Property Agent an escalated complaints procedure if they are unhappy with how their complaint has been dealt with by the Property Agent.
My second list of challenges to The PRS I will call them (the first was successful), took approximately 5 months to resolve. The result included the most serious mistake from them. They stated that I hadn’t provided enough evidence that my flat was “uninhabitable” in response to my claim for compensation, as I had to be out of my flat for 8 days whilst the damp work was done. The plastering specification stated that four out of five rooms were being done with old plaster removed creating dust everywhere. My body has a lung disease through living here, but no-one could have lived there throughout, as the bedroom had had everything removed, the living room had some furniture under cover in a corner, the bathroom had work done right by the toilet, and the hallway had work done on it.
Before my second claim, I checked with the Leasehold Advisory service and my own private legal advice, who both conveyed that as I was entitled to quiet enjoyment as stated in my lease, and I couldn’t receive quiet enjoyment whilst away for 8 days while the freeholders repaired rising damp (from their ground) and penetrating damp (through their walls). As lease-holder I am only responsible for the inner shell. The PRS caseworker did not even check with the builders that the flat was indeed uninhabitable. No evidence was submitted to me that the flat was habitable, and no-one suggested that the flat might be habitable during the whole process.
So the kitchen was the only room that didn’t require repairs. In my appeal to the PRS, I asked them where was I supposed to sleep? Also in their proposed decision, there was also two aspects where I was successful. Decorating, back to the state it was prior to repairs, and an amount for stress, both £100 awards. I’m thankful but I told them that it is a pittance. The decision stated that I did not provide decoration receipts. Who would provide them before a
decision was made, unless asked to? It then states in their terms that the amounts awarded cannot be challenged. So you have a key final award aspect within a proposed decision. I questioned this in my appeal, is this legal?
Finally, two or three times in the decision they mentioned to take my points to a first tier tribunal. Yet they are there to assist the consumer. I believe that one of these points was to do with finishing a little outside work. It took 5 months to tell me on certain points to go somewhere else. Why not tell me that information at the outset? Customer service?
My appeal to them was not answered at all. The final decision was the award of 2 x £100.00. No other statement. In my appeal I stated that this was an official, formal complaint about the case-worker, and then additionally I made the same about the top manager who completely ignored my appeal and complaints at the final decision. My complaints stand absolutely for perpetuity until common sense prevails.
They did not appear to be connected to what actually occurred or wish to find out. I am not political, but I am incensed. The worst decisions and service that I’ve ever experienced in my Life by millions. I never give up and I require help? It is unacceptable.
If you need to go to the PRS, please note what I’ve written. I also asked them, how do consumers know that their agent is part of a government authorised redress Scheme, and do they check whether it occurs. No answer as yet. I was yet to ask whether there’s such a scheme for residential freeholders too.
Re my damp, it’s now been 23 months since I formally asked to have it done, and 2 aspects still to do. The British government needs to thoroughly renew leasehold, and leasehold extension laws (it’s almost 6 months since I requested a lease extension, no agreement yet, I have not delayed it). Totally unacceptable again.Housing is a key part of healthy living. Great if laws can be rewritten fairly for the current day. Thank you, god luck in what you do that is creative.
Detta är Trustpilot
Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.
Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.
Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.
Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.
Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.
Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.








