Strongrootswebdesign Omdömen 1

TrustScore 3 av 5

3,2

Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer

För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer


Kontaktuppgifter

3,2

Medel

TrustScore 3 av 5

1 omdöme

5 stjärnor
4 stjärnor
3 stjärnor
2 stjärnor
1 stjärna

Så använder företaget Trustpilot

Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.

Företag på Trustpilot får inte erbjuda incitament eller betala för att dölja omdömen. Omdömen är enskilda användares åsikter och inte Trustpilots åsikter. Läs mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

I recently terminated services with Strong Roots Web Design

I recently terminated services with Sarah Gershone due to her lack of preparedness and professionalism in actually completing the project. Specifically, we had our first official meeting to start the project, what she limits to one hour. As per our agreement I had sent her all content five days earlier including the proposed website outline, and suggested content for all areas. She acknowledged receiving the information and replied "looks good." At the time of the meeting, it was immediately evident she had not reviewed any of the content. For example, the first document she brought up was a list of assessment tools I use which simply an insert. She described this as the "home page". When I told her this was simply an insert, she could not find the home page, so I had to take over the screen sharing and show her the home page document. She then had no specific comment on any of the documentation I previously sent her. Later in the session she made a general comment that the documentation I had produced was not good, implying it could not be used on the website. For reference, I identified content for every area of my practice (such as anxiety, depression) did searches on typical statements therapist make, created my own version and then ran it through AI several times. I provided her multiple examples in each area. Sarah then proceeded to ask me vague (she describes them as "open-ended") questions, such as the type of client's that come to my practice. When I asked specifics such as mostly males, better educated etc, she wasn't satisfied with my response. The session was ended earlier because it was clear to both of us it was a very unproductive meeting. Within one hour (11 am) I sent her an email specifying three concerns: 1) if she didn't like my content she had five days to review it, she could have told me prior to the meeting and/or rescheduled; 2) if she wants to ask open-ended questions which is how she wants to form the website, she should have let me know the questions ahead of time (per her agreement there is only one hour for the meeting) and 3) it was very unlikely she had not properly prepared for the meeting. I finished the email that I was still willing to work with her, but I needed a very different effort from her. After 24 hours she had not replied so I ended services with her. When she did reply her choice was to say I was defensive during the meeting and not acknowledging the obvious she had not done her job. I requested full reimbursement due to her lack of services and told her I would not pursue matters further. Instead she "itemized" out $1700 worth of services she said she already done, which is remarkable since we had only 30 minutes of the first working session, for which she was not prepared. Sarah notes on her website she is a "busy mom of four [children]". So I understand if someone does not always follow through. What concerns me is her lack of accountability and feeling she is entitled to $1700 with no meaningful work produced. I am sure she will respond to this review with she did what was on the contract. However, much of this is only verifiable by her and she does not acknowledge the obvious (as recorded on her session) she was not prepared to do the work. I gave her multiple opportunities to either change her business approach or refund the money. She did neither. I suggest you think seriously about this before signing any contract with her.

15 januari 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan

Är det här ditt företag?

Registrera din profil för att få tillgång till våra kostnadsfria företagsverktyg, och kom närmare dina kunder.

Skapa ett konto gratis

Detta är Trustpilot

Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.

Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.

Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.

Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.

Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.

Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.

Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.

Läs mer