This is really useful useful Llm
This is really useful useful Llm. I used this for generate videos and images and contents.
Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer
För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer
This is really useful useful Llm. I used this for generate videos and images and contents.
2137 filters! The model should be blocked in Poland, just like China blocks Western AI models.
Qwen3Guard is an anti-human moderation.
The system blocks a wide range of political content, not just that concerning China. It even blocked content like "June 4th is Corpus Christi in Poland" (a holiday) —the filters don't capture the context.
Red messages should have even bigger exclamation points!!! Qwen 3.6 Plus is a good model for coding, but the developers should be dismissed. Ask the model to write two commas between letters and let's not go crazy.
Unfortunately, this is not an alternative to the OpenAI 5.2 and 5.3 models.
einfach nur müll, bilder langweilig und einfach sinnlos zusammen gesetzt. ständig die gleichen bilder egal wie du den prompt veränderst. du hast nen modernen bahnhof und willst zb. eine säule hinzufügen, dann bekommst du eine säule aus dem mittelalter, sinnlos ins bild eingefügt. das macht jedes andere modell besser
What Is infuriating that despite it's good image instructed editing and option for ratios during normal image generation, It's stuck with horizontal ratio when it came to Image edit. There is no option to make the image ratio vertical during editing. I don't get this limitation.
Edit: It went too censored and useless...
great ai but ruined 2 hours of work and broke real life hardware
awful , for anything related to design is just terrible, plus more info prompt you give the bigger the confusion. for simple task is ok, but for that we don't need ai. is jus a waste of time
Funziona abbastanza bene ma ultimamente su velocità, funzionalità e affidabilità trovo sia stata superata da Gemini.
Ad ogni modo, il fatto che sia totalmente gratuita, e comunque abbastanza veloce e precisa nella generazione, è un valore aggiunto.
E' gestita da Alibaba che non credo sia così rispettosa della privacy ma se vogliamo essere onesti, sono pochissime le AI che lo sono davvero, al di là dei proclami e delle promesse spesso disattese.
The best ai, that I've ever seen. Free video generating, image editing, image generation, coding and other. I use it for making ai content and it is so good at it. I recommend it to all. It actually helps me a lot.
As your average user, and after having very good results with ChatGPT for what I use it for, I can honestly say that if Qwen is the future as AI, we are all going to die of stupidity. The images are ugly, slick, boring… the responses are not nuanced. For example, I asked it to draft a specific motion in a specific court for a specific judge, and it started out with Dear Judge WTF.
And honestly, if you want to create some visual images just do the hard work and stop consuming this junk.
ChatGPT is a little workhorse. It’s only as smart as your questions however. I found with Qwen. It’s just inherently, narrow and stupid. and I realize it doesn’t use its whole database to answer a question but really sorry that’s the problem. It’s like you’re hungry and you want to eat lunch and they serve you bubblegum.
This AI hyper-sexualises and displays misogyny when sent an image containing a woman. Why? Because she is dressed, but it sexualises her on its own and refuses the request itself. I have never seen this before, this is just an Asian AI.
This model hallucinating alot, and also the it didn't like understand if you want to build project with qwen coder, it just alright I'll make this as worse as possible, even though I already said to read carefully on the Todo file
Great potential, but over-censorship ruins it!!!
Qwen’s AI has strong technical capabilities, but its excessive blocking of spiritual and metaphysical discussions—especially those rooted in Chinese tradition (Feng Shui, Bazi, I Ching, etc.)—makes it unusable for many culturally or spiritually curious users.
1. Blocks Chinese Cultural Heritage – It’s ironic that a Chinese-developed AI censors topics like Feng Shui remedies or Bazi analysis, which are deeply tied to China’s history and philosophy. If I wanted generic answers, I’d use Western AI.
2. Hypocritical Moderation – Discussing Western astrology or psychology is allowed, but Eastern metaphysics is labeled "superstition" and banned. This is cultural bias..
3. No User Freedom – Adults should decide if they want to explore these topics.
Request to Developers:
- Add an opt-in setting for spiritual/cultural topics (with disclaimers).
- Stop conflating tradition with "harmful" content—Feng Shui isn’t dangerous.
- If the goal is to serve global Chinese culture, this censorship defeats the purpose.
Until then, I’ll use uncensored alternatives. A shame—this could’ve been the best AI for Eastern philosophy.
Oh, never ever type the most censored word "Tibet"!!! Even if it's just "Traditional Tibetan Astrology or Tibetan Medicine!!! Unbelievable how this topic is so sensitive for them .. if they could, they r "burn you in fire" for asking anything related to Tibet..and it's 2025!!!
Do not use this for research purpose, this AI is like is crazy and it makes up story provides links sources that are false, never use this for your research purposes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.
Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.
Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.
Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.
Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.
Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.
Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.
Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.