The market for US Forces in Iran (Apr 30) resolved Yes erroneously. This was a 300$+ million market that was manipulated by large whale gamblers via Uma where they could put 750$ securities for... Se mer
Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer
För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer
Det här tycker kunderna
SCAAAAAAAAAAAAAM guys don’t deposit they always manipulate outcomes in favor of whales i tried to claim $21 that I won, but it never appeared in my balance support is terrible they don’t respond at... Se mer
UMA Whales use economic power to push votes to sides that may not be right according to rules. By rules set for the US x Iran ceasefire, the event on April 7th does NOT match the rules, however, th... Se mer
I bought $50 worth of NO for "U.S. force enters Iran by April 30". To this day there was no ground invasion, but a ceasefire. However, it resulted in YES. All the comments under this bet are saying th... Se mer
Har inte besvarat negativa omdömen
Så använder företaget Trustpilot
Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.
Tuve un problema con unos fondos que…
Tuve un problema con unos fondos que envie erroneamente por mi culpa, eligiendo un par erroneo, y en menos de 30 minutos, tenia a un agente ayudandome en el proceso, en cuestion de 15 minutos con un poco de feedback de mi parte, se soluciono, y pude recuperar mis fondos perdidos!!!!
10 ESTRELLAS!!!!!!
Had a very complicated issue that…
Had a very complicated issue that Winston was able to get resolved for me. It took days to get resolved because of how complicated it was. However, he always updated me. I was able to get my issue resolved. Thanks again!
scaaaaaaaaams guys don't deposit
SCAAAAAAAAAAAAAM guys don’t deposit they always manipulate outcomes in favor of whales i tried to claim $21 that I won, but it never appeared in my balance support is terrible they don’t respond at all. Stay away from these scammers
And I won’t even get started on the $4k I lost betting "no" while the outcome was “yes” on a ceasefire between the US and Iran on April 7 which didn’t even happen
I am disappointed because everything is…
I am disappointed because everything is just a scam! I have not been able to get my funds out of this company. They are full of empty promises, and they will never release your withdrawal. I know #Crop#Mines................# to be exceptional in all their services and assure steady payouts without any problem.
they are very obvious scammers that…
they are very obvious scammers that work for the elites to rob people off money they should all face legal actions and be in prison for the types of scams they do dont trust them!!
SCAM SCAM SCAM
If you think about prediction market follows rules and facts to resolution, think again, the UMA is based on which side UMA whales bet on, basically who has the most money to sway their interests. The rules written by each market, doesn't matter at all. It's a straight up scam. I will never touch this piece of garbage ever again. So many people been scammed by the US-Iran ceasefire market, me too, i lost 20k, let's learn the lesson here and let this polyscammarket die.
It is a scam
It is a scam
I made a bet that the US x IRan war will come to a cease fire after the 7 of April but whales said ended up saing yes and not no so polymarker made the answer YES sothat the whales can win what a scam even tho the correct aswer was NO becasue the cease fire was only the 8 of April
I wount trust this site at all , they dont go with the correct they go with the whales
THE WORST SCAMMERS
THE WORST SCAMMERS
**Formal Note on Disputed Resolution – US–Iran Ceasefire (April 7 Market)**
The market was resolved as **YES**, however, this outcome is disputed based on verified facts.
Both sides only issued **conditional statements**, not an unconditional ceasefire agreement:
* Trump proposed a ceasefire *subject to conditions*.
* Araghchi responded with a *conditional halt* only if attacks stopped.
Additionally, **hostilities continued shortly after**, with missile alerts reported across multiple regions, indicating no effective ceasefire was in place within the deadline.
Even subsequent reports described the situation as a **“conditional ceasefire”**, not a confirmed or operational one.
**Conclusion:**
There was no mutual, unconditional, and effective ceasefire before the deadline. The YES resolution appears inconsistent with the actual events.
If such discrepancies are not addressed transparently, it raises concerns about fairness and the influence of large stakeholders on the outcome.
This matter requires serious review.
US x Iran ceasefire scam
By rules set for the US x Iran ceasefire, the event on April 7th does NOT match the rules, however, the vote is swayed to yes from UMA whales with millions on the bet. Polymarket must step in.
Should have checked reviews first - Avoid!
Wish I had read other reviews before transferring any money to this platform. Big mistake. My balance now shows zero and their customer support is non-existent - no responses, no help whatsoever. I should have done my research first - would never have sent funds if I had. Save yourself the trouble and avoid. Learn from my mistake and check reviews before using this service.
The uma voting is a scam
The uma voting is a scam, if you’ve got money you win, why hasn’t polymarket done anything about it, they done this on the straight of Hormuz being closed last month, now the ceasefire which wasn’t a ceasefire. What a joke. #polyscam
He was super nice & polite… never felt…
He was super nice & polite… never felt like talking to him for the first time… came exactly to the point & most importantly have very good understanding & listen to you properly.
A votação das Forças dos EUA no Irã (30…
A votação das Forças dos EUA no Irã (30 de abril) votou "Sim" erroneamente. O resgate de pilotos abatidos não se enquadra em "operação terrestre deliberada" — é circunstancial e explicitamente excluído pelas regras ("Pilotos abatidos... não serão contabilizados"). Isso configura uma falha de mercado excepcional: ambiguidade nas regras + contradição ética (a Polymarket anulou as apostas de resgate de pilotos, mas permite lucro por meio dos socorristas). A votação da UMA provavelmente foi manipulada (precedente de grande porte: acordo de US$ 7 milhões com a Ucrânia). "Não" está de acordo com a letra e o espírito da regra; "Sim" é uma manobra semântica. Exige-se uma análise de falha de mercado quanto à ambiguidade, inconsistência e risco de manipulação.
This app is a scam
This app is a scam, I lost 2k in the Iran resolution to Yes...
o site apoia manipulações de…
o site apoia manipulações de resultados, e não se importam com os resultados.
Markets are not going with the facts
Really bad.Lost about 300 dollars.The…
Really bad.Lost about 300 dollars.The problem is that the bet doesnt matter if you are right or wrong.The thing that matters are the guys who have milions of voting tokens.They decide the outcome of the betting.not the truth I will sue polymarket and i hope the owners of this scam market gets what they deserve.
UMA Whales use economic power to push…
UMA Whales use economic power to push votes to sides that may not be right according to rules.
By rules set for the US x Iran ceasefire, the event on April 7th does NOT match the rules, however, the vote is swayed to yes from UMA whales with millions on the bet. Polymarket must step in.
Don’t play here
Don’t play here, it’s bad — they manipulate the final outcome.
Uma is a scam they just change the…
Uma is a scam they just change the result without knowing the fact
Detta är Trustpilot
Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.
Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.
Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.
Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.
Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.
Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.
Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.
Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.








