Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer

För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer

3,2

Medel

TrustScore 3 av 5

1 omdöme

5 stjärnor
4 stjärnor
3 stjärnor
2 stjärnor
1 stjärna

Ingen inbjudningshistorik registrerad

Det här företaget har inte bjudit in sina kunder. Omdömen kanske inte är representativa

Så använder företaget Trustpilot

Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.

3,2

Alla omdömen

(1)

1 omdöme under de senaste 12 månaderna

Skriv ett omdöme

Vi kontrollerar omdömen

Företag på Trustpilot får inte erbjuda incitament eller betala för att dölja omdömen. Omdömen är enskilda användares åsikter och inte Trustpilots åsikter. Läs mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

I trusted Inspiration School of Luanda…

I trusted Inspiration School of Luanda with my son's safety. I collected him with a head injury no one told me about, and later in tears.

I am a mother and a mathematics teacher. I never imagined writing this.

Before enrolling my 11-year-old son, a child with special needs that affect his balance, at Inspiration School of Luanda (Talatona), we told the school everything in writing, including that he cannot stand steadily on one foot. The school asked for a classroom assistant. We hired her and paid her salary ourselves.

What happened:
• 28 September 2026: he struck his head on a steel protrusion in the playground. It was the first head injury of his life. Nobody told us; we found it ourselves at pick-up.
• 17:27: I emailed the school. At 17:37 his class teacher, Ms Kearabiloe Marapani, replied that they were "looking into" it. At 19:37 the Founder and Chairperson, Ms Geeta Singh, wrote: "Please allow Ms. Keara and me to come back to you with the details by tomorrow."
• 5 October: we met the school's leadership and calmly set out every contradiction. At their request, we sent him in the next day without his smartwatch.
• 6 October: after his assistant had been sent away, Ms Geeta Singh took him alone into a room near the library. I collected a child in tears, begging never to go back. We withdrew him that day.

What the school said vs. what happened:
1. The injury: Ms Kearabiloe Marapani stated that he arrived at school already injured that morning. His classroom assistant, whose presence the school itself had required, stated that she handed him over unharmed and that he had no injury until midday. Both cannot be true.
2. Telling the parents: the school did not inform us; we found the injury ourselves at pick-up. No first aid was shown to us and no incident report was given. At 19:37 Ms Geeta Singh wrote that they would come back to us "with the details by tomorrow". That written account never came.
3. The playground: Ms Kearabiloe Marapani suggested that he had no right to play where he was hurt. On 5 October the school's leadership confirmed that children may play in that area.
4. The blackboard: we were told that he had kicked a raised blackboard many times. The school knew in writing that he cannot stand steadily on one foot, and his assistant saw none of what was alleged. He denied it.
5. The questioning: on 6 October, after his assistant had been sent away, Ms Geeta Singh questioned him alone, without his assistant or a parent, and he was pressed to apologise to his teacher.
6. The emails: as the school required, we sent our questions by email (his subject teachers' names, access to the learning platforms, the assistant's role). They went unanswered until the evening of 6 October, after we had told the school that he would not return. That reply was incomplete and written as though all were well.
7. The cameras: the school stated that cameras cover the premises. We requested the recordings of the playground injury of 28 September and of our meetings.

Afterwards, the school refunded every cent we had paid.

My son and I have returned to our country. My husband remains in Angola because of his work. In Angola, they destroyed our faith and hope that our child could receive a safe education.

Parents, ask yourself: would you leave your child there?

My advice is simple: stay away from this school and the people who run it.

28 september 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan

Är det här ditt företag?

Registrera din profil för att få tillgång till våra kostnadsfria företagsverktyg, och kom närmare dina kunder.

Skapa ett konto gratis

Detta är Trustpilot

Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.

Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.

Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.

Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.

Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.

Läs mer