Claude Omdömen 8

TrustScore 2.5 av 5

2,4

Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer

För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer


Kontaktuppgifter

2,4

Dålig

TrustScore 2.5 av 5

8 omdömen

5 stjärnor
4 stjärnor
3 stjärnor
2 stjärnor
1 stjärna

Så använder företaget Trustpilot

Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.

Företag på Trustpilot får inte erbjuda incitament eller betala för att dölja omdömen. Omdömen är enskilda användares åsikter och inte Trustpilots åsikter. Läs mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

1 Star: Premium subscriber treated as a non-customer

I'm a paying Claude Pro Max 5x subscriber at the highest consumer tier. Here is what happened today, with timestamps so the events speak for themselves.

At 12:54 I sent Anthropic support a detailed email about sustained service quality issues with Claude Code. The email was around 1,500 words and included two evidence attachments totalling 18 pages: a technical incident report on a regression in the latest Claude Code VS Code extension (versions 2.1.141 and 2.1.142), and a candid self-report Claude itself wrote acknowledging a separate session that destroyed a documentation migration on my project. The email cited six prior support tickets, three of which Anthropic's AI agent ('Fin') had explicitly escalated to a human with the message 'we'll email you as soon as an agent has responded.' No human ever replied to any of those three. My email explicitly asked, after six AI-only conversations and three undelivered human-escalation promises, for a response from a human.

At 12:57, three minutes later, I received a reply declining the refund. It is not physically possible for a human to have read either attachment, the email body, the six prior conversation transcripts, or the GitHub issue cluster cited as evidence in three minutes. The reply is signed at the bottom 'This answer was composed by Fin AI Agent, Anthropic's AI Agent.' The Fin signature confirms what the timing already proved.

I replied within the hour, calmly, addressing each point Fin made and giving Anthropic until end of business the following day to put a human on the case before I initiated a chargeback and a complaint to the Irish consumer protection authority. Their response, again within minutes and again from Fin, was to close the ticket entirely: 'This conversation has been closed and is no longer monitored. If you need further assistance, please submit a new request.'

So to be clear about what a premium subscription with Anthropic buys at the moment:

- A technical regression openly documented across 30+ separate user reports on Anthropic's own public GitHub repository, present and unresolved for at least 2.5 weeks. Other users describe it as 'breaks about 50% of my chats or more' and 'I'm not receiving most of my messages.' Anthropic's automated triage bot has been closing these reports as duplicates of an unrelated bug it claims is 'fixed' in the current version. It isn't.

- Documented support failure across multiple contacts. Fin AI handles every interaction. When Fin says a human will follow up, no human does. When the customer escalates with detailed evidence, Fin replies in three minutes and closes the ticket.

- A cancellation flow that doesn't actually let you cancel. My billing settings show only a 'downgrade to Pro' option — there is no cancel button. Under EU consumer law, cancellation must be at least as accessible as subscription. Right now it isn't.

- Extra-usage charges burning through the monthly limit on retries and re-prompts caused by the broken service. I've spent roughly 60% more than the headline subscription rate this cycle and the bulk of it has gone to redoing work the service failed to deliver the first time.

The product itself, when it works, is genuinely the best AI assistant on the market. I have defended it in conversations with other developers. But the gap between the quality of the model and the quality of the support is now wide enough that I cannot in good conscience recommend it to anyone. The 1.4/5 Trustpilot rating across hundreds of reviews exists because this is the standard experience, not the exception.

If you are considering subscribing to Claude Pro or Pro Max, please read the existing reviews carefully before committing your card details. The product is excellent. The support is non-existent. The cancellation path may not work when you need it. And if you have a problem with billing, technical service, or anything else, you will be talking to Fin AI, and Fin AI will not help you.

15 maj 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Funziona un solo giorno su sette.

Dunque, ho deciso di sottoscrivere un abbonamento annuale una settimana fa a questa intelligenza artificiale.
Per carità, una spesa sostenibilissima di soli 220,00 euro, per CLAUDE PRO (dove PRO sta quale abbreviazione di PROFESSIONAL).
Intendevo utilizzarla per la mia professione (lavoro nel settore giustizia), ma in una sola settimana è riuscita ad essere efficiente un solo giorno.
Poi, il buio: clicco sull'incona e compare una finestra vuota.
Quell'unica volta che sono riuscita a protestare direttamente con l'applicativo, mi ha dato ragione e mi ha suggerito di chiedere un rimborso.
Ma che m'importa del rimborso!
A me serve l'aiuto che ho chiesto.
Peraltro, almeno in quell'unica giornata è stato estremamente pedante ed ha utilizzato espressioni inutilmente dottrinali, che nessuno gli aveva chiesto.
Però questo al limite fa parte dell'addestramento, basta ricalibrarlo per l'analisi della norma in relazione al fatto.
Questa è l'esperienza che ho fatto finora: un solo giorno di funzionamento su sette giorni, mi sembra davvero pochino, per definirsi "PROFESSIONAL"!
C'è COPILOT - gratuito - che funziona benissimo ed anche GOOGLE (anch'esso gratuito) non è male.
Per un'applicatuvo a pagamento non mi aspetto che sia peggiore di due applicativi gratuiti.

4 maj 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Title: Platform bug locked my billing — no human support after multiple escalations

I'm an Annual Pre-Paid Pro subscriber. After a recent platform upgrade, my billing country was automatically changed from UAE to Egypt without my action. This broke my entire account — I cannot update my billing address, company details, or payment methods. The system reverts every change I make.

The irony: Anthropic's own Invoice EACUHTCJ0001 (March 31, 2026) contains the correct UAE billing details. They charged my UAE card successfully for both my annual subscription and a $200 top-up. Then their system deleted the data.

I've tried to fix this over 20 times through Settings. I've emailed support, used the in-app chat, and escalated multiple times (Conversation ID: 215474082038605, submitted April 27, 2026). Every response has been from "Fin AI Agent" — an AI bot that suggests self-service steps that don't work for this bug.

I am actively trying to upgrade to the Max plan and pay more. The bug is preventing me from doing so.

I love the Claude product, but the billing infrastructure and customer support are not at the level you'd expect from a company of this caliber. International customers with non-US billing details appear to be disproportionately affected.

31 mars 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

hidden costs

First they let you deposit money to buy tokens and then if you want to use them with an API you still have to purchase a subscription

20 februari 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan

Är det här ditt företag?

Registrera din profil för att få tillgång till våra kostnadsfria företagsverktyg, och kom närmare dina kunder.

Skapa ett konto gratis

Detta är Trustpilot

Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.

Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.

Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.

Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.

Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.

Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.

Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.

Läs mer