Även om vi inte verifierar specifika pĂ„stĂ„enden eftersom omdömeslĂ€mnarnas Ă„sikter Ă€r deras egna, kan vi mĂ€rka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekrĂ€fta att en företagsinteraktion har Ă€gt rum. LĂ€s mer

För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas bÄde verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vÄr automatiserade programvara som Àr tillgÀnglig dygnet runt. Tekniken Àr utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehÄll som bryter mot vÄra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte Àr baserade pÄ en Àkta upplevelse. Vi Àr medvetna om att vi inte kan lÀgga mÀrke till allt. Det gÄr att flagga sÄdant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. LÀs mer

Företagsinformation

  1. Fitness och nÀringslÀra
  2. Personlig trÀnare
  3. TrÀningsprogram

Informationen kommer frÄn olika externa kÀllor

The C.H.E.K Institute offers exercise education and fitness products for strength and conditioning experts, rehabilitation specialists, personal trainers and fitness enthusiasts worldwide.


Kontaktuppgifter

3,2

Medel

TrustScore 3 av 5

1 omdöme

5 stjÀrnor
4 stjÀrnor
3 stjÀrnor
2 stjÀrnor
1 stjÀrna

Ingen inbjudningshistorik registrerad

Det hÀr företaget har inte bjudit in sina kunder. Omdömen kanske inte Àr representativa

SÄ anvÀnder företaget Trustpilot

Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hÀmtas, betygsÀtts och modereras.

3,2

Alla omdömen

(1)

1 omdöme under de senaste 12 mÄnaderna

Skriv ett omdöme

Vi kontrollerar omdömen

Företag pÄ Trustpilot fÄr inte erbjuda incitament eller betala för att dölja omdömen. Omdömen Àr enskilda anvÀndares Äsikter och inte Trustpilots Äsikter. LÀs mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjÀrnor

CHEK institute Review CHEK Academy Training Cost & Accreditation Warning

As the first ever Level 5 Master Practitioner in this country—having studied for six years from 2003 and invested over £40,000—I am leaving this factual review to warn prospective students about the systemic business sabotage and lack of industry value I have experienced.

Factual Proof of Website Sabotage: Gavin Jennings sent me an email explicitly claiming, "I would never sabotage you." However, the CHEK Connect directory [INDEX] proves otherwise. I am completely hidden from the homepage, while the CEO, lower-level practitioners, and faculty members are prominently displayed. If a user manually searches "UK" and "Central London", or clicks through to page 2, my profile finally appears. However, the moment a user clicks on my Level 5 Master profile, the site automatically redirects the user straight back to the front page. This intentional loop completely blocks my traffic while ensuring faculty members like Leigh Brandon and Warren Williams (who are already promoted on the main site) intercept the visibility. This technical diversion has resulted in a 2,028 ghost-click metric with zero inquiries reaching me.
Seven Attack Emails & Refusal to Resolve: When I reached out simply wanting to resolve this technical profile blockade, the institute completely refused to uphold my complaint. Instead, they hit me with seven separate attack emails threatening me with the police and attempting to wrap me in bureaucratic red tape.
Active GDPR Investigation & Hidden Communications: The institute has systematically denied my legal right to a Subject Access Request (SAR). I have legally requested all internal emails and data dating back to 2013 involving Paul Chek, Penny Crozier, Gavin Jennings, Matt Wallden, and Phil Loizides [INDEX] to expose the coordination behind my profile blocking. Because they refused to hand over this data, a formal complaint has been filed and they are under official investigation by data protection authorities.
Zero Academy Support & Disability Discrimination: When I trained to become a Master Practitioner, there was no academy and zero mentoring support; I had to study the entire complex system completely on my own. Furthermore, the institute showed a total lack of support regarding my dyslexia. Their web platforms and student systems provide absolutely zero accessibility adjustments or help for individuals with learning difficulties and disabilities. The current "in-house" mentoring system is simply a method to control students and stop them from finding independent practitioners online.
Exploitative Faculty Demands: The reason I am not listed as corporate faculty is because I refused to comply with their demand to work for FREE for five weeks with no payment. Complying with this would have taken an independent practitioner two years just to earn back the lost revenue.
Withheld Course Materials & Price Hikes: The institute has recently hiked fees up to ÂŁ322 a month. Furthermore, multiple students have reported paying for multi-level courses (such as the quadrants) only to be withheld materials and provided with only a single level after paying for two.
Zero External Industry Recognition: This training holds absolutely no independent external recognition outside of their own private organization. It is completely unrecognised by UK regulatory bodies like Ofqual, commercial gyms, or medical professionals like physiotherapists and osteopaths.
The Annual License Trap: Gavin Jennings stated face-to-face that despite an estimated ÂŁ32 million global value, they do not spend money on advertising practitioners. Instead, they force you to pay for an additional "license" every single year that carries zero external value, telling you to "get your own clients" while their multiple websites divert all web leads strictly to the owners.
Brand-Damaging Leadership Behaviour: The leadership’s public behaviour, including Paul Chek openly smoking tobacco and substance habits in his videos, actively degrades the brand and makes it incredibly difficult for professional practitioners to sell these high-ticket services to genuine, health-conscious clients.
Attempted Silence Bribes & Threats: I approached Gavin Jennings face-to-face over two years ago to resolve this issue. Instead of fixing the website, two faculty members threatened me with legal action if I went public with the truth, and subsequently attempted to bribe me with access to all new courses for FREE to keep me quiet.
Prospective students must look past the marketing. The fact that my library of over 100 factual videos exposing these exact technical and administrative facts remains fully online proves that the truth cannot be legally taken down

18 juni 2026
Omdöme utan inbjudan

Är det hĂ€r ditt företag?

Registrera din profil för att fÄ tillgÄng till vÄra kostnadsfria företagsverktyg, och kom nÀrmare dina kunder.

Skapa ett konto gratis

Detta Àr Trustpilot

Vem som helst fÄr skriva ett omdöme pÄ Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme Àger sitt omdöme och detta innebÀr att personen i frÄga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme nÀr som helst. Omdömen finns kvar pÄ Trustpilot sÄlÀnge omdömeslÀmnarens konto Àr aktivt.

Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.

LÀs mer om andra typer av omdömen.

Vi skyddar vÄr plattform med hjÀlp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. LÀs mer om hur vi bekÀmpar falska omdömen.

LÀs mer om omdömesprocessen pÄ Trustpilot.

HÀr Àr 8 tips pÄ hur man kan skriva omdömen pÄ bÀsta sÀtt.

Verifieringen hjÀlper till att sÀkerstÀlla att det Àr riktiga mÀnniskor som skriver omdömena som du lÀser pÄ Trustpilot.

Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan pÄverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot vÄra riktlinjer.

LĂ€s mer