Banfield Pet Hospital - Oxnard Omdömen 2

TrustScore 3 av 5

2,9

2141 North Rose Ave, 93036 Oxnard, CA, US


Även om vi inte verifierar specifika påståenden eftersom omdömeslämnarnas åsikter är deras egna, kan vi märka omdömen med en ”verifierat”‑etikett ifall vi kan bekräfta att en företagsinteraktion har ägt rum. Läs mer

För att skydda plattformens integritet granskas både verifierade och overifierade omdömen av vår automatiserade programvara som är tillgänglig dygnet runt. Tekniken är utformad för att identifiera och ta bort innehåll som bryter mot våra riktlinjer, inklusive omdömen som inte är baserade på en äkta upplevelse. Vi är medvetna om att vi inte kan lägga märke till allt. Det går att flagga sådant som du tror att vi kan ha missat. Läs mer

Företagsinformation

  1. Veterinär
  2. Djursjukhus

Informationen kommer från olika externa källor

Banfield Pet Hospital veterinarians provide the best preventive pet health care for your cat, dog or other pet. Open late and on weekends, and conveniently located, Banfield is there for you and your pets.


Kontaktuppgifter

2,9

Medel

TrustScore 3 av 5

2 omdömen

5 stjärnor
4 stjärnor
3 stjärnor
2 stjärnor
1 stjärna

Har inte besvarat negativa omdömen

Så använder företaget Trustpilot

Se hur deras omdömen och betyg hämtas, betygsätts och modereras.

Företag på Trustpilot får inte erbjuda incitament eller betala för att dölja omdömen. Omdömen är enskilda användares åsikter och inte Trustpilots åsikter. Läs mer

Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Pets at the Oxnard location aren't safe.

This review is specific to the Banfield location in Oxnard, CA on Rose Ave. (Prior to this and since this visit I've experienced vets who care for our pets.)

We brought our dog to the Banfield location in Oxnard, CA last week.  He had been vomiting, coughing, and his diet had changed completely.  

The vet we saw was dismissive and combative.  She also neglected to tell me that Cooper had a heart murmur - although she noted it in his electronic file.  

When he declined even more, we brought him to the WestLake Village office where we learned that Cooper has an enlarged heart, a leaky valve and that he needs to be seen by a cardiologist immediately.  

It's outrageous that this was missed.  We've lost valuable time getting Cooper the care he needs.  We have a cardiologist appointment now for the 21st.  Had we known a week ago about his condition - we could have acted more quickly.  

An example of her combativeness - when I asked if she recommended that we keep Cooper on fish oil supplements - her response was, sure, if you don't care about his weight.  She avoided eye contact most of the visit, didn't introduce herself and didn't interact with Cooper at all - in front of me.  

It's worth saying that the tech was incredibly kind and responsive in engaging with Cooper, but it's the vet who provides the medical care and it's clear that pets under this woman's care aren't safe. 

29 september 2025
Omdöme utan inbjudan
Betygsatt 1 av 5 stjärnor

Former employee & client

Former employee here. I highly recommend staying away from Banfield (corporate medicine) in general. As an employee and as a client for this hospital, when I was faced with an emergency that would either need emergency surgery to save my dogs life or he would need to be euthanized (my dog had a splenic tumor that was previously diagnosed due to it bleeding, we scheduled him for surgery at the TO clinic but the splenic tumor began to bleed again days before surgery), I could not get anyone at this hospital to pick up the phone. I was scheduled to work and was unsure if I should go straight to an emergency clinic or if I bring him to work with me. I decided to show up at work with my pet, when I did arrive and notified the staff of the pet's sudden onset of symptoms (refused food that morning, lethargic, pale gums) which all pointed to another internal bleed from the tumor, both doctors on staff and the three other technicians did not respond to the patient appropriately. Although we spoke, and the history of his splenic tumor was brought up, the pet was not treated like an emergency in anyway. The pet was not triaged as soon as possible and he was made to wait to be seen by a doctor while she examined two other healthy, stable patients who were dropped off for preventative care services. Luckily, being a technician myself, I began recording the pet's vital signs, collected blood and began a PCV test then called other associate veterinarians to help assist me interpret the lab results and guide me through the next steps. Eventually one of the associate vets I was consulting with came in to the clinic to assess my pet, and ended up euthanizing him.

There was an instance where I have witnessed a doctor and technicians attempt to place an IV catheter in an elderly dog 12 times - I voiced my concern over how many times they attempted an IV on his collapsed veins but was dismissed. This pet was hospitalized at a local ER the night before and was scheduled to go under anesthesia for a routine dental cleaning as a preventative care service and the pet had barely any build up and did not need extractions. This was for revenue.

I witnessed 5 technicians attempt to forcefully hold down a pit-bull after an ear swab broke off in its ear (shaking during swab) because they couldn’t get it out. It got to the point where the pet began mouthing, almost bite like movements, but he was not outwardly aggressive. He had 5 full grown humans jump on him one by one until it was literally a dog pile, that dog was a saint. It wasn’t until I yelled “Enough” and gave them an earful, took the dog from them and recommended they call the owner for sedation that the overseeing doctor and those 5 technicians stopped how they were treating that pet and changed course.

I witnessed a doctor recommended an owner have us continue with their pet's routine dental cleaning instead of postponing to run a bile acids test because the pet had abnormally high liver enzymes on its pre-anesthetic bloodwork which resulted in death of that pet due to the liver shunt. This course of action was also revenue driven.

I witnessed Mars Corporation (they own Banfield) degrade the quality of supplies (tape for IV catheters, syringes, vaccines, etc.) in our hospitals all while increasing the costs for clients and then go spend money on ridiculous things like advertisements on NASCARS for the brand.

I witnessed this company try to have us enforce Benadryl injections to all pets prior to vaccines, which is an additional cost to the owner to increase revenue. If you are familiar with their Wellness Plans, I have also witnessed this company require us to charge for exams like neuro exam, extremities/lameness exam, etc. on top of the normal exam fee and do this specifically to wellness plan clients whose office exams are covered for a year by their plan.

Do yourself, your pet and the veterinary community a favor by spending your time and hard-earned money at a veterinary practice that has integrity.

19 december 2024
Omdöme utan inbjudan

Detta är Trustpilot

Vem som helst får skriva ett omdöme på Trustpilot. Den som skriver ett omdöme äger sitt omdöme och detta innebär att personen i fråga kan redigera eller ta bort sitt omdöme när som helst. Omdömen finns kvar på Trustpilot sålänge omdömeslämnarens konto är aktivt.

Företag kan be sina kunder om omdömen via automatiska inbjudningar. Dessa omdömen markeras som verifierade för att visa att det handlar om verifierade upplevelser.

Läs mer om andra typer av omdömen.

Vi skyddar vår plattform med hjälp av dedikerade medarbetare och smart teknologi. Läs mer om hur vi bekämpar falska omdömen.

Läs mer om omdömesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Här är 8 tips på hur man kan skriva omdömen på bästa sätt.

Verifieringen hjälper till att säkerställa att det är riktiga människor som skriver omdömena som du läser på Trustpilot.

Att erbjuda belöningar för omdömen eller att bara be en viss grupp personer att skriva ett omdöme kan påverka företagets TrustScore. Detta strider mot våra riktlinjer.

Läs mer